CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Opinion: The Case for Why the Constitution Blocks Trump Being President Again

Section Three of the 14th Amendment disqualifies a person from holding public office if they have participated in “insurrection or rebellion” after having taken an oath. In an opinion for TIME, CERL Affiliated Faculty Kermit Roosevelt addresses the questions of whether Donald Trump is constitutionally allowed to run for re-election in 2024 and if excluding someone from the presidential ballot can be considered anti-democratic.

Kermit Roosevelt works in a diverse range of fields, focusing on constitutional law and conflict of laws. He has published scholarly books in both fields. Conflict of Laws (Foundation Press, 2010) offers an accessible analytical overview of conflicts. The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions (Yale, 2006) sets out standards by which citizens can determine whether the Supreme Court is abusing its authority to interpret the Constitution. Read his bio here.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Opinion: The Case for Why the Constitution Blocks Trump Being President Again on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Opinion: The Case for Why the Constitution Blocks Trump Being President Again