CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court

Share this Post

Related posts

Green & Black Modern Dotted We Are Hiring Instagram Story (1200 x 840 px) (3)

Call for applications: Post-doctoral fellow

CERL logo

CERL, NIMJ, LDAD, and legal experts file amicus brief in support of Governor Newsom’s lawsuit against President Trump, citing grave rule of law concerns

White House, Washington D.C.

The Trump administration’s bias is polluting the integrity of the intelligence community and damaging the nation’s security

CERL logo

CERL files amicus brief in Trump v. Illinois on behalf of more than 150 members of Congress in the Senate and House

Group of soldiers or spies in dark room with large monitors and advanced satellite communication technology launching a missle. Includes flashing yellow light.

“Acknowledged” covert activity and regime change plans for Venezuela?

A group of Republicans on Monday filed an amicus brief arguing that removing Mark Meadows’ Georgia election case to federal court would be inappropriate, citing the constitutionally entrusted role of states to administer federal elections. CERL Executive Board member Stuart Gerson is among the signatories.

Stuart Gerson is Member of the Firm at Epstein Becker Green, former Acting Attorney General of the United States, and Founding Member of Checks & Balances. He is also a member of the CERL Executive Board. Read his bio here.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
New legal brief argues against removing Meadows’ case to federal court