Participants
DePaul University College of Law
University of California, San Diego
The Catholic University of America
Federal Systems
Dell Dailey and Family
University of Southern California Dornsife
University of Iowa
University of Oxford
Tel Aviv University
Major General, United States Army (Retired)
University of Pennsylvania Law School
West Point
Stockholm University
University of Pennsylvania
Ave Maria School of Law
Rutgers School of Law
School of Law at SOAS, University of London
US Naval Academy
Ohio Northern University, Pettit College of Law
University of Southern California Dornsife
Dalhousie University
Vanderbilt University
Rutgers
University of Maryland
Vanderbilt Law School
Cornell University Law School
University of Iowa College of Law
University of Pennsylvania Law School
University of Pennsylvania Law School
U.S. Marine Corps Commanding Officer, NROTC
Physicians for Human Rights, Center for Translational Medicine
Attorney at Law
Background Readings
General Theory and Readings
Waltman, G. Prosecuting ISIS. University of Mississippi School of Law, 2014.
List of All Security Council resolutions dealing with Terrorism
Govern, K. The Legal Way Ahead Between War And Peace (Chapter 16) in, Enemy Combatants, Terrorism, and Armed Conflict Law: A Guide to the Issues. 2008.
Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and International Humanitarian Law. International Committee of the Red Cross, October 2016.
What Does International Humanitarian Law Say About Terrorism? International Committee of the Red Cross, January 2015.
Article III Courts
Vladek, S. The Supreme Court, the War on Terrorism and the Separation of Powers. A.B.A. Human Rights Magazine. Vol. 38, No. 1, 2011.
American Bar Association Standing Committee on Law and National Security. Trying Terrorists in Article III Courts, Challenges and Lessons Learned. 2009.
Donahue, L. Terrorism Trials in Article III Courts. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 38, 2015: 105-143.
Baker, J., Defending the Rule of Law: The Military Commissions Defense Organization. The Champion, Sept-Oct. 2015.
Baker, J. Keynote Speech on Military Commissions, NATSECDEF Conference, Georgetown University, 2016.
Greenburg, K. Case by Case: ISIS Prosecutions in the United States. Center on National Security, Fordham Law, 2016.
Hodgkinson, S. Are Ad-hoc Tribunals an Effective Tool for prosecuting International Terrorism Cases? Emory International Law Review, Vol. 24, 2010: 515-525.
Waters, T. Yezidis v. ISIS at the ICC: Why the fight for Genocide Charges is an Uphill Battle. Foreign Affairs, Mar. 29, 2016.
SQ Press, Closing Guantanamo, Sept. 30, 2016
U.S. Common Law Regarding Guantanamo
Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004)
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006)
Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008)
US Criminal Prosecutions Regarding Abu Ghraib
U.S. v. Harman, 66 M.J. 710 (1965)
U.S. v. Graner, 66 M.J. 104 (2010)
U.S. v. Smith, 68 M.J. 316 (2010)
U.S. v. England, WL 6842645 (2009)
U.S. Common Law regarding U.S. Detainees and Right to Due Process
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1868)
Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950)
Braden v. 30thJudicial Circuit of Kentucky , 410 U.S. 484 (1973)
Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004)
U.S. Common Law Regarding Judicial Limits on Executive War Powers
Prize Cases, 67 U.S. 635 (1863)
In Re: Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1 (1946)
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)
Domestic Adherence to the Rule of Law in the Fight Against Terrorism
Apuzzo, M., Fink, S., & Risen, J. How US Torture Left a Legacy of Damaged Minds, N.Y. Times, Oct. 9, 2016
Johnson, D., Mora, A., & Schmidt, A. The Strategic Costs of Torture: How Enhanced Interrogation Hurt America, Foreign Affairs, September/October 2016.
Wagstaff, R. Terror Detentions and the Rule of Law: US and UK Perspectives, in The Rule of Law, Chapter 5: 114-146. 2014.
Aronofsky, D. The War on Terror: Where We Have Been, Are, and Should Be Going. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, Vol. 40, 2011.
International Prosecutions Regarding Illegal Detentions and Torture
Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom (2001)
Ad Hoc Courts
Updated Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. 2009.
Akhavan, P., et al. The Contribution of Ad Hoc Tribunals to International Humanitarian Law, American University. International Law Review,. Vol. 13, No. 6, 1998: 1509-1539.
Handbook for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, 2008.
ICC
ICC Has No Jurisdiction to Prosecute ISIS Despite “Crimes of Unspeakable Cruelty”, The Guardian, 2015.
El Shahed, S. Prosecuting ISIS poses Challenges to International Justice, Al Arabiya News, 2014.
Morris, M. High Crimes and Misconceptions: The ICC and Non-Party States. Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol. 64, No. 1, 2001: 13-66.
Asymmetric War
Mazzar, M. The Folly of Asymmetric War. The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2008: 33-53.
Non State Actors, 76 Int’l L. Ass’n Rep. Conf. 686 (2014)
Non State Actors, 75 Int’l L. Ass’n Rep. Conf. 658 (2012)
Non State Actors, 74 Int’l L. Ass’n Rep. Conf. 630 (2010)
For all ILA docs: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Index?collection=intyb (Subscribers only)
Beytenbrod, S. Defining Aggression: An Opportunity to Curtail the Criminal Activities of Non-State Actors. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, No.2, 2011: 1-19.
Wood, G. What ISIS Really Wants. The Atlantic, 2015.
McCants, W. Islamic Scripture is Not the Problem. Foreign Affairs, 2015.
Stern, J., and Berger, J.M. ISIS: The State of Terror. 2015.
McInnis, K. Coalition Contributions to Countering the Islamic State. Congressional Research Service. April, 2016.
Page, Rob. ISIS and the Sectarian Conflict in the Middle East. House of Commons Library. March, 2015.
Statehood
Khatab, S. The Power of Sovereignty: The Political and Ideological Philosophy of Sayyid Qutb. Routledge Studies in Political Islam, First Edition. 2006.
Weber, C. Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1992: 199-216.
Lara, R. The Problem of Sovereignty, International Law and Intellectual Conscience. Journal of the Philosophy of International Law, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2014: 1-26.
Grant, T. Defining Statehood: The Montevidio Convention and its Discontents. Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 34, 1999: 403-457.
Lewis, D. Suppressing Foreign Terrorist Fighters and Supporting Principled Humanitarian Action: A Provisional Framework for Analyzing State Practice. 2015.
Threat Financing
European Commission/US Treasury: Joint Report on Threat Financing. 2013.
Funding of ISIS
The Center for Analysis of Terrorism, ISIS Financing, 2015.
F.A.T.F. Financing of the Terrorist Organisation Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). 2015.
al-Khatteeb, L. How Iraq’s Black Market in Oil funds ISIS. CNN, 2014.
Oil, Extortion, Crime: Where ISIS gets its money. NBC, 2014.
Davis, J.H. Enforcer at Treasury is First line of Attack against ISIS. The New Work Times, 2014.
Rhodan, M. Treasury Department’s Anti-Terrorism Chief Says cutting off ISIS Fund of High Importance. TIME, 2014.
Di Giovanni, J., Goodman, L., & Sharkov, D. How does ISIS Fund its Reign of Terror? Newsweek, 2014.
Northam, J. UN Security Council Passes Resolution Targeting ISIS Funding, NPR, 2014.
Security Council Resolution 2199. 2015.
Security Council Resolution 2253. 2015.
Toobin, J. The Legal Logic of the Case Against Hastert. The New Yorker, 2015.
Friedersdorf, C. Why is it a Crime to Evade Government Scurtiny? The Atlantic, 2015.
31 U.S. Code § 5324
United States v. Scanio, 900 F.2d 485 (1990)
Lawsuit against Saudi Arabia
Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act
Justice against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, Pub. L. No. 114-222 (2016) 2040, 105th Cong.
In re Terrorist Attacks on September 1, 2001, No. 03-MDL-1570, slip op. (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2015) (Opinion Granting The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia and Herzegovina Motion to Dismiss)
Foreign Sovereign Immunity United States Law
28 U.S. Code 1603-1611 (1976)
A.L.I. Restatement, Fourth, Foreign Relations Law of the United States- Sovereign Immunity. Tentative Draft No. 1, 2015.
28 U.S. Code 605A (2008)
Purpose of Justice Against State Sponsors of Terrorism Act
Schumer, Cornyn Announce “Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act”. Charles E. Schumer United States Senator for New York, 2015.
Senate Passes Cornyn Bill to Help Victims of Terror Attacks Seek Justice. John Cornyn United States Senator for Texas, 2016.
Schwartz, F. Senate Passes Bill Permitting 9/11 Victims’ Families to Sue Saudi Arabia. The Wall Street Journal, 2016.
Zengerle, P. Senate Passes Bill Allowing 9/11 Victims to sue Saudi Arabia. Reuters, 2016.
After Rejecting Obama Veto, Lawmakers Now Have Doubts About 9/11 Lawsuit Bill. Fortune, Sept. 30, 2016
Obama Administration’s Response
Graham, D. Why Obama Vetoed the 9/11 Lawsuit Bill. The Atlantic, 2016.
Press Briefing by the Press Secretary Josh Earnest. The White House, 2016.
Saudi Arabia’s Response
Mazzetti, M. Saudi Arabia Warns of Economic Fallout if Congress Passes 9/11 Bill. New York Times, 2016.
Mazzetti, M. Senate Passes Bill Exposing Saudi Arabia to 9/11 Legal Claims. New York Times, 2016.
Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA)
August, 2012, Opinion to Judgment Mandate re: Order of District Court on In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al.)
September 29, 2015, Opinion Granting The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia and Herzegovina Motion to Dismiss
June 8, 2016, Brief of Defendants-Appellees The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia and Herzegovina Motion to Dismiss
July 25, 2016, Reply Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants
August 10, 2016, Brief for Plaintiffs Appellants
Other Terrorism Lawsuits
Stempel, J. U.S. Court Voids $655 Million Verdict Against PLO Over Israel attacks. Reuters, 2016.
Sokolow et al v. Palestine Liberation Organization et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 15-3135 slip. op. (2d Cir. Aug. 31 2016)
Rapoport, M. PLO Settles Klinghoffer Suit over Achille Lauro Murder, Wall Street Journal,1997.
Klinghoffer v. PLO, 937 F.2d 44, 19 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1277, 1991 AMC 2751, 1991 U.S. App. Decision.
Klinghoffer v. SNC Achille Lauro, 739 F. Supp. 854 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)
Prosecuting Perpetrators of Sexual Violence
Rogers, S. Sexual Violence or Rape as a Constituent Act of Genocide: Lessons from the Ad Hoc Tribunals and a Prescription for the International Criminal Court. George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 48, 2016.
United Nation’s Human Rights Council. “They Came to Destroy’: ISIS Crimes Against the Yazidis.” U.N. Doc. A/HRC/32/CRP.2 (June 15, 2016)
Sellers, P. The Prosecution of Sexual Violence in conflict: The Importance of Human Rights as Means of Interpretation. Guidance Document. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (October 28, 2009).
Required Readings
SESSION 1: STEMMING THE TIDE OF EXTREMISM: THE ROLE OF DEMOCRATIC VALUES AND THE RULE OF LAW
JESSICA STERN AND J.M. BERGER, ISIS: The State of Terror 2015
John C. Dehn, Transnational Self-Defense: Human Rights-Based Transnational Counterterrorism Norms (abstract)
Claire Finkelstein, Contemporary Armed Conflict and the Non-State Actor (abstract)(article)
Karen Greenberg, Center on National Security at Fordham Law. Case by Case: ISIS Prosecutions in the United States, 2016
Duncan MacIntosh, The Rule of Law and the Laws that Rule: Considerations Towards a Special Status for Rebels (abstract) (article)
“The Islamic Response to the Government’s Nine Accusations”, Joint statement of the 9/11 military commissions accused, 2009.
SESSION 2: FROM THE PLO TO SAUDI ARABIA: THE EFFECTIVENESS USING CIVIL SUITS TO COMBAT STATE-SPONSORED AND ORGANIZATIONAL TERRORISM
In re Terrorist Attacks on September 1, 2001, No. 03-MDL-1570, slip op. (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2015) (Opinion Granting The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia and Herzegovina Motion to Dismiss)
Justice against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, Pub. L. No. 114-222 (2016) 2040, 105th Cong.
After Rejecting Obama Veto, Lawmakers Now Have Doubts About 9/11 Lawsuit Bill, FORTUNE, Sept. 30, 2016
Klinghoffer v. PLO, 937 F.2d 44, 19 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1277, 1991 AMC 2751, 1991 U.S. App. Decision.
SESSION 3: FOLLOWING THE MONEY: IDENTIFYING AND COMBATING THREAT FINANCING
The Center for Analysis of Terrorism, ISIS Financing, 2015.
European Commission/US Treasury: Joint Report on Threat Financing. 2013.
SESSION 4: PROSECUTING TERRORISTS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM MILITARY COMMISSIONS, ARTICLE III COURTS, INTERNATIONAL COURTS, AND AD HOC TRIBUNALS
Adam Thurschwell, What is a Terrorism Trial? (abstract)
John G. Baker, Defending the Rule of Law: The Military Commissions Defense Organization, THE CHAMPION, Sept-Oct. 2015
Laura Donohue, Terrorism Trials in Article III Courts, 38 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol. 2015
Sandra L. Hodgkinson, Are Ad-hoc Tribunals an Effective Tool for prosecuting International Terrorism Cases? 24 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 515 (2010)
Guenael Mettraux, International Crimes And The Ad Hoc Tribunals 3-4 (2005) (Chapter 1: The Creation and Jurisdiction of the ad hoc Tribunals
Timothy Waters, Yezidis v. ISIS at the ICC: Why the fight for Genocide Charges is an Uphill Battle, FOREIGN AFFAIRS, Mar. 29, 2016
Excerpts from Al Bahlul v. United States, No. 11-1324, 767 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2014)
SESSION 5: PROSECUTING PERPETRATORS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE : CAN THE CRIMINAL LAW BE AN EFFECTIVE DETERRENT OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN WAR?
Shayna Rogers, Sexual Violence or Rape as a Constituent Act of Genocide: Lessons from the Ad Hoc Tribunals and a Prescription for the International Criminal Court,48 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 265 (2016).
United Nation’s Human Rights Council, “They Came to Destroy’: ISIS Crimes Against the Yazidis.” U.N. Doc. A/HRC/32/CRP.2 (June 15, 2016)
Rape and Sexual Violence, Chapter 16, The Geneva Conventions in Context: A Commentary, with Indira Rosenthal, eds. Prof. Clapham, Prof. Geata and Prof. Sassoli, Oxford University Press (2015)
Kevin Govern, Rape As An Act Of Terrorism: Overcoming Impunity With Legal Prescription and International Prosecution. (Abstract)
SESSION 6: LOOKING IN THE MIRROR: ARE THERE BENEFITS TO DOMESTIC ADHERENCE TO THE RULE OF LAW IN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM?
Matt Apuzzo, Sheri Fink & James Risen, How US Torture Left a Legacy of Damaged Minds, N.Y. TImes, Oct. 9, 2016
Douglas A. Johnson, Alberto Mora & Averell Schmidt, The Strategic Costs of Torture: How Enhanced Interrogation Hurt America, Foreign Affairs, September/October 2016 at 121.
Christopher Fuller, Killing to Save Life: Human Rights Law and the Protection of the Right to Life (article)
Joshua Andresen, Putting Lethal Force on the Table: How Drones Change the Alternative Space of War and Counterterrorism (article)
ROBERT H. WAGSTAFF, TERROR DETENTIONS AND THE RULE OF LAW: US AND UK PERSPECTIVES 114-146 (2014) (Chapter 5: The Rule of Law)