CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Trump team’s doctrine for presidential immunity threatens the military chain of command 

In an op-ed for The Atlantic, CERL’s Professor Claire Finkelstein and University of Minnesota Law School Professor Richard W. Painter argue that the doctrine of presidential immunity being presented by former President Donald Trump’s legal team should be utterly denied by the U.S. Supreme Court. Citing the amicus brief they filed in conjunction with 13 other national security experts, Finkelstein and Painter assert that a president’s immunity from criminal prosecution could wear away confidence in the chain of command, and risk military discipline and regular functioning. 

Claire Finkelstein is the Algernon Biddle Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy and Faculty Director of the Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law. Read her bio here

The views expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of any organization or university

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Trump team’s doctrine for presidential immunity threatens the military chain of command  on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Trump team’s doctrine for presidential immunity threatens the military chain of command