CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​

Russia’s disruption of U.S. drone was within the laws of armed conflict

A U.S. Air Force drone crashed over the Black Sea on Tuesday after being intercepted by two Russian SU-27 fighters. In an interview with USA Today, CERL Advisory Council member Mary Ellen O’Connell cautions against direct confrontation with Russia over the crash, explaining that Russia’s actions were within the laws of armed conflict, even if conducted in what top White House national security spokesman John Kirby deemed a “reckless” manner.

Mary Ellen O’Connell is the Robert and Marion Short Professor of Law and Research Professor of International Dispute Resolution—Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame. Her work is in the areas of international law on the use of force, international dispute resolution, and international legal theory. Read her full bio here.

Mailing List

Submissions

Submissions to The Rule of Law Post. Please refer to CERL’s submission guidelines for additional details on the blog post format. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you please complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Russia’s disruption of U.S. drone was within the laws of armed conflict on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Russia’s disruption of U.S. drone was within the laws of armed conflict