CENTER FOR ETHICS AND THE RULE OF LAW​
Mary Ellen O'Connell

Russia’s disruption of U.S. drone was within the laws of armed conflict

Share this Post

Related posts

Microphones prepared for the press conference and mic flags displaying fake news logos: disinformation and propaganda concept, blank copy space

How the Trump administration is weaponizing the Communications Act of 1934

A U.S. Air Force drone crashed over the Black Sea on Tuesday after being intercepted by two Russian SU-27 fighters. In an interview with USA Today, CERL Advisory Council member Mary Ellen O’Connell cautions against direct confrontation with Russia over the crash, explaining that Russia’s actions were within the laws of armed conflict, even if conducted in what top White House national security spokesman John Kirby deemed a “reckless” manner.

Mary Ellen O’Connell is the Robert and Marion Short Professor of Law and Research Professor of International Dispute Resolution—Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame. Her work is in the areas of international law on the use of force, international dispute resolution, and international legal theory. Read her full bio here.

Mailing List

Submissions

A blog covering ethics and rule of law issues in national security, warfare, and democratic governance. The opinions expressed in these posts are those of the writers and do not necessarily represent CERL’s official views.

Please submit to the Rule of Law Post via this form. For additional details on the blog post format, refer to CERL’s submission guidelines. Should your submission be accepted, we ask that you kindly complete the Agreement to Transfer Copyright.

Please upload text in one document under 6 mb. Preferred format as a simple text file (.txt).

Share Russia’s disruption of U.S. drone was within the laws of armed conflict on:

LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Reddit
Email
Print
Russia’s disruption of U.S. drone was within the laws of armed conflict